RE: Status code for censorship?

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] 
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 11:03 AM
To: James M Snell
Cc: Tim Bray; Mark Nottingham; Karl Dubost; ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Status code for censorship?

On 2012-06-11 17:54, James M Snell wrote:
> I can definitely live with that.. anything that increases the 
> visibility of censorship is not a bad thing.  

Yes, but what incentives are there for censors to comply with its use?
Martin

Looks like status code
> 427 is open currently.
> ...

So is 418. In any case, if we go there it should be 451.

Best regards, Julian

PS: and I do agree with Mark that it's unlikely that it'll be tricky to get something standardized that might give the impression that censorship is ok.