W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Status code for censorship?

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:03:15 +0200
Message-ID: <4FD616C3.3050200@gmx.de>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
CC: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2012-06-11 17:54, James M Snell wrote:
> I can definitely live with that.. anything that increases the
> visibility of censorship is not a bad thing.  Looks like status code
> 427 is open currently.
> ...

So is 418. In any case, if we go there it should be 451.

Best regards, Julian

PS: and I do agree with Mark that it's unlikely that it'll be tricky to 
get something standardized that might give the impression that 
censorship is ok.
Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 16:03:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 11 June 2012 16:03:56 GMT