- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 19:48:28 +0200
- To: "Roberto Peon" <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "ChanWilliam(陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, "Mike Belshe" <mike@belshe.com>
Le Ven 6 avril 2012 19:30, Roberto Peon a écrit : > This is important. This problem exists today. The way I've seen it working > is that the captive portals refuse arbitrary access to any site but the > author site through :443 until you've authenticated. This is the simplest configuration possible. Sometimes some :443 sites are deliberately whitelisted for business reasons, which makes it real hard for the user to identify why part of the web it accessible but not all (and as long as browsers refuse to display anything not served by the :443 site there is no way for the proxy to explain the filtering policy) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Friday, 6 April 2012 17:49:02 UTC