- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:16:46 +0000
- To: Brian Pane <brianp@brianp.net>
- cc: ifette@google.com, ChanWilliam(???) <willchan@chromium.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
In message <CAAbTgTs55FmKP+HOKhNOz-q_SY1cBec7XLpxqruhFN-+TxtieA@mail.gmail.com> , Brian Pane writes: >In terms of performance, that's a step backwards from SPDY in two ways: > >- An additional round trip is needed to negotiate the use of HTTP/2.0. You mean that it suffers from being interoperable with HTTP/1.1 ? I don't see that as a shortcoming, I see that as a requirement in the WG charter... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 15:17:14 UTC