W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Ascii-based SPDY "compression" idea

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:16:46 +0000
To: Brian Pane <brianp@brianp.net>
cc: (wrong string) ™ˆ™˜Œ) <willchan@chromium.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <27359.1333379806@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CAAbTgTs55FmKP+HOKhNOz-q_SY1cBec7XLpxqruhFN-+TxtieA@mail.gmail.com>
, Brian Pane writes:

>In terms of performance, that's a step backwards from SPDY in two ways:
>
>- An additional round trip is needed to negotiate the use of HTTP/2.0.

You mean that it suffers from being interoperable with HTTP/1.1 ?

I don't see that as a shortcoming, I see that as a requirement
in the WG charter...

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 15:17:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:59 GMT