W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Prefer Draft Feedback

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:16:45 +0100
Message-ID: <4EDA051D.6000408@gmx.de>
To: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-12-03 00:01, James Snell wrote:
> All,
>
> I would like to take a quick moment to solicit feedback on the current
> version of the HTTP Prefer Header specification:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-http-prefer-04
>
> The draft should be pretty well self-explanatory. There are some
> highly tentative pieces included in this draft that may likely be
> removed in a future iteration. They have been included now primarily
> for the purpose of soliciting feedback on their overall utility.
> ...

Will review.

One thing I already noticed is that the spec does the same mistake most 
other header field definitions make; it defines an extensible syntax but 
then special cases the header field it defines itself.

Parsing should be uniform.

So,

- if you take value-less tokens, you need to state whether

   x

   x=

   x=""

are equivalent or not.

- if values can be tokens or quoted-strings, you should state that both 
notations are equivalent, and are allowed everywhere, so are

   priority=100

and

   priority="100"

the same thing?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 3 December 2011 11:17:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:50 GMT