W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: #255 and #299: Status code semantics

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:51:43 +0100
Message-ID: <4ED9F12F.2010902@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-12-03 00:34, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/255>
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/299>
>
> Both of these tickets are about expanding / refining the semantics of existing status codes.
>
> However, draft-nottingham-http-new-status has been taken up as an AD-sponsored draft, and provides specific, new status codes for those semantics. So, I propose we close these tickets with no action (in the case of #255, this means backing out our previous changes).
>
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/nottingham-http-new-status>
>
> Thoughts?

+1
Received on Saturday, 3 December 2011 09:52:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:50 GMT