W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: status code for header fields to big

From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:26:41 -0700
Message-ID: <4ED950A1.2000007@stpeter.im>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 12/2/11 3:21 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-12-02 23:06, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> ...
>>> (although it does have "431 Request Header Fields Too Large"). Where did
>>> we end up on this one?
>>> ...
>>
>> The definition of 413 will be reverted back to what it said before
>> change <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1310>.
>> ...
> 
> Sorry, me confused about two different headers.
> 
> We did not change 413, as 431 was on the table.
> 
> We *did* extend 503, and this can be backed out if we get 429.

You'll get it. I plan to start the IETF Last Call in the next few days.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 22:27:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:50 GMT