- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:21:03 +0100
- To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-12-02 23:06, Julian Reschke wrote: > ... >> (although it does have "431 Request Header Fields Too Large"). Where did >> we end up on this one? >> ... > > The definition of 413 will be reverted back to what it said before > change <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1310>. > ... Sorry, me confused about two different headers. We did not change 413, as 431 was on the table. We *did* extend 503, and this can be backed out if we get 429. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 22:21:37 UTC