W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: #312: should there be a permanent variant of 307?

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:45:03 +0100
Message-ID: <4EBD510F.5010702@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-11-11 17:40, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-11-11 17:22, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> WFM
>> ...
>
> -> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1474>
> ...

And, with the next edit I have replaced

	There is  no equivalent counterpart for 301 Moved Permanently.

by

	This specification defines no equivalent counterpart for 301 Moved 
Permanently.

(avoiding the implication that there can't be one in the future).

<sorryforthecheckinnoise/>

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 11 November 2011 16:45:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:50 GMT