W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: #300: Define non-final responses

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:41:50 +0200
Message-ID: <4EA5954E.9060909@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-07-18 08:05, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I think we're hitting diminishing returns here, and possibly approaching the angels dancing on the pins.
>
> If someone has a proposal for a text change that they think will represent consensus, great.
>
> In the meantime, I don't see any pushback on the proposed resolution, as it affects p1.
> ...

So what is the proposed resolution?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 16:42:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:49 GMT