W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: 202 Accepted, Location, and Retry-After

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:24:01 +0200
Message-ID: <4EA59121.9080502@gmx.de>
To: James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
On 2011-10-24 18:13, James Snell wrote:
> Julian, thank you for the pointer, I had missed that thread entirely.
> The distinction between the final response and the status monitor
> concern could be addressed through the additional application of the
> Content-Location header. Within a 202 Response, the Location URI would
> be assumed to point essentially to a status monitor, while the
> Content-Location would point to the URI of the final response. If they
 > ...

In which case we'd need to special-case status code 202 within 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-latest.html#identifying.response.associated.with.representation>, 
right?

> ...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 16:24:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:49 GMT