W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-02.txt

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:53:43 +0200
Message-ID: <4EA27687.1040800@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@me.com>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
On 2011-10-19 01:57, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> FYI. Some adjustment of the status codes in -01, and one new one (thanks to Jan for the idea).
> ...

Looks good. Let's finish this.

One concern, one nit:

- it's suboptimal that we have an example of a Refresh header field with 
no spec for it (that could be worked around by making it a META tag in 
the response body)

- in appendix B, s/network filesystem access/remote authoring/.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 22 October 2011 07:54:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:48 GMT