- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:44:49 +1100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@me.com>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thanks; updated on github. On 22/10/2011, at 6:53 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-10-19 01:57, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> FYI. Some adjustment of the status codes in -01, and one new one (thanks to Jan for the idea). >> ... > > Looks good. Let's finish this. > > One concern, one nit: > > - it's suboptimal that we have an example of a Refresh header field with no spec for it (that could be worked around by making it a META tag in the response body) > > - in appendix B, s/network filesystem access/remote authoring/. > > Best regards, Julian -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 23 October 2011 04:45:22 UTC