W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: I-D Action: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-02.txt

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:44:49 +1100
Cc: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@me.com>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <5676DF1A-5AB1-4CBD-88B9-242050235D3A@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Thanks; updated on github.

On 22/10/2011, at 6:53 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 2011-10-19 01:57, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> FYI. Some adjustment of the status codes in -01, and one new one (thanks to Jan for the idea).
>> ...
> 
> Looks good. Let's finish this.
> 
> One concern, one nit:
> 
> - it's suboptimal that we have an example of a Refresh header field with no spec for it (that could be worked around by making it a META tag in the response body)
> 
> - in appendix B, s/network filesystem access/remote authoring/.
> 
> Best regards, Julian

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 23 October 2011 04:45:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:48 GMT