- From: Andreas Petersson <andreas@sbin.se>
- Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 16:00:51 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 10/6/11 6:21 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:12:13 +0200, Andreas Petersson wrote: >> On 10/5/11 12:38 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >>> In message <20111005123338.320c38d4@hetzer>, Andreas Petersson writes: >>> >>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-petersson-forwarded-for-01.txt >>>> >>>> Please comment. >>> >>> ] proto-kv = "proto=" ( "http" | "https" ) >>> >>> Given Speedy, Websockets and other such experiments, shouldn't this >>> allow any protocol-name ? >>> >> >> Yes, I guess that sounds quite reasonable. But will every protocol >> always only have one unique name, that everyone would use, without need >> for discussion? >> >> Another, perhaps a non-issue, would be name changes (somewhat like >> jabber vs. xmpp or yp vs. nis). > > Maybe establish a (lightweight!) registry? Or is there one already? > > How about using the URI part "scheme name" ( BCP35, http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html ) ? /Andreas
Received on Saturday, 8 October 2011 14:01:30 UTC