W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: I-D draft-petersson-forwarded-for-01.txt

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:21:40 +0000
To: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2a1159da8e681e616476b4aef7ed14be@mail.mxes.net>
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:12:13 +0200, Andreas Petersson wrote:
> On 10/5/11 12:38 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <20111005123338.320c38d4@hetzer>, Andreas Petersson 
>> writes:
>>
>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-petersson-forwarded-for-01.txt
>>>
>>> Please comment.
>>
>> ]       proto-kv   = "proto=" ( "http" | "https" )
>>
>> Given Speedy, Websockets and other such experiments, shouldn't this
>> allow any protocol-name ?
>>
>
> Yes, I guess that sounds quite reasonable. But will every protocol
> always only have one unique name, that everyone would use, without 
> need
> for discussion?
>
> Another, perhaps a non-issue, would be name changes (somewhat like
> jabber vs. xmpp or yp vs. nis).

Maybe establish a (lightweight!) registry? Or is there one already?


>
> /Andreas Petersson

-- 
Mark Nottingham
http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 16:22:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:48 GMT