- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:21:40 +0000
- To: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:12:13 +0200, Andreas Petersson wrote: > On 10/5/11 12:38 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <20111005123338.320c38d4@hetzer>, Andreas Petersson >> writes: >> >>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-petersson-forwarded-for-01.txt >>> >>> Please comment. >> >> ] proto-kv = "proto=" ( "http" | "https" ) >> >> Given Speedy, Websockets and other such experiments, shouldn't this >> allow any protocol-name ? >> > > Yes, I guess that sounds quite reasonable. But will every protocol > always only have one unique name, that everyone would use, without > need > for discussion? > > Another, perhaps a non-issue, would be name changes (somewhat like > jabber vs. xmpp or yp vs. nis). Maybe establish a (lightweight!) registry? Or is there one already? > > /Andreas Petersson -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 16:22:07 UTC