W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: I-D draft-petersson-forwarded-for-01.txt

From: Andreas Petersson <andreas@sbin.se>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:12:13 +0200
Message-ID: <4E8C9DFD.2090908@sbin.se>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 10/5/11 12:38 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20111005123338.320c38d4@hetzer>, Andreas Petersson writes:
> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-petersson-forwarded-for-01.txt
>>
>> Please comment.
> 
> ]       proto-kv   = "proto=" ( "http" | "https" )
> 
> Given Speedy, Websockets and other such experiments, shouldn't this
> allow any protocol-name ?
> 

Yes, I guess that sounds quite reasonable. But will every protocol
always only have one unique name, that everyone would use, without need
for discussion?

Another, perhaps a non-issue, would be name changes (somewhat like
jabber vs. xmpp or yp vs. nis).

/Andreas Petersson
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2011 18:12:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:48 GMT