On 10/5/11 12:38 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20111005123338.320c38d4@hetzer>, Andreas Petersson writes: > >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-petersson-forwarded-for-01.txt >> >> Please comment. > > ] proto-kv = "proto=" ( "http" | "https" ) > > Given Speedy, Websockets and other such experiments, shouldn't this > allow any protocol-name ? > Yes, I guess that sounds quite reasonable. But will every protocol always only have one unique name, that everyone would use, without need for discussion? Another, perhaps a non-issue, would be name changes (somewhat like jabber vs. xmpp or yp vs. nis). /Andreas PeterssonReceived on Wednesday, 5 October 2011 18:12:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:48 GMT