Re: draft-bryan-metalinkhttp-18.txt

2011/1/20 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>:
> On 19.01.2011 15:49, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa wrote:> ...
>>>
>>> No, this was just a suggestion that you *could* define to make the
>>> request
>>> conditional based on the digest, in which case the dance about ETag
>>> policies
>>> wouldn't be needed.
>>>
>>
>> So we can define state token for instance digest and use "If" header with
>> it.
>> Do you think it is better to use only instance digest and not use ETag?
>
> It depends on whether you think it's ok to require servers to implement a
> non-trivial part of WebDAV (I think that probably answers this :-).
>

Thank you for answering!
I don't think it is a good idea to require non-trivial implementation
just for checking hash value.
As ETag part in ID is now in good shape, I'm leaning toward to ETag.

Best regards,

Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa