On 2011-06-08 13:57, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > ... > > A "transforming HTTP proxy" is a HTTP server, and we should > not even think about mentioning them. > > 203 should just be dropped. > ... Well, we just came to the conclusion a few days ago that we can't drop it. If you to argue against that, please have a look at Roy's mail from May 30 (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2011AprJun/0280.html>). Best regards, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 12:13:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:41 GMT