W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: I-D Action: draft-nottingham-linked-cache-inv-00.txt

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:44:59 +0000
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
cc: Brian Pane <brianp@brianp.net>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Balachander Krishnamurthy <bala@research.att.com>, cew@cs.wpi.edu
Message-ID: <54912.1306881899@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <A4FFD300-095F-41F7-A8C6-922331364487@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri
tes:

>It is true that the invalidations aren't atomic, but in practice the 
>speed of application is good enough.

If speed is not a part of the design the draft should say so.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 22:45:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:41 GMT