W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Content-Disposition next steps

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:50:53 +0100
Message-ID: <4CDBE6AD.2000203@gmx.de>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
OK,

here's a summary of what changes have been done so far compared to draft 
03 -- these are not published as draft yet; see diff-marked version at 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-latest-from-previous.diff.html> 
and full text at 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-content-disp-latest.html>:

1) <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/243>

Added a minor clarification that ISO-8859-1 *only* works in 
quoted-string (I know Björn is still unhappy, but at least this adds 
more precision).

2) <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/252>

Stated that modification-date *is* supported by some UAs (-> Konqueror).

3) <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/253>

Clarify implied LWS rule.

4) <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/258>

Rephrase a sentence not to use passive voice.

5) <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/260>

We agreed to WONTFIX this.

6) <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/261>

We agreed to WONTFIX this.

7) <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/262>

Mark has proposed to close this without changes; do we need more feedback?

8) <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/263>

Clarified the subsection that describes somewhat the percent-unescaping 
strategy of IE and Chrome.

9) <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/264>

Clarified that the RFC5987 language tagging isn't very useful for filenames.

10) <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/265>

Clarified that this spec is not about C-D in HTTP *payloads*.


The following issue remains open:

<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/259>

...and I have made a rough proposal in 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010OctDec/0450.html>.


I think the current changes are an improvement over draft -03, and would 
like to submit it soonish (independently of what we do with respect to 
issue 259).

Feedback appreciated, Julian
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 12:51:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:33 GMT