W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: [#259] Handling invalid Content-Dispostion headers

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:17:09 +0100
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Message-id: <838A211D-78FE-4E20-951A-99655AAC9B93@apple.com>
To: "Eric J. Bowman" <eric@bisonsystems.net>

On Nov 4, 2010, at 11:54 PM, Eric J. Bowman wrote:

> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> In addition, micro-managing this may even be harmful if we end up 
>> defining different strategies for different headers (for instance for 
>> Content-Type as compared to Content-Disposition). It seems it would
>> be a better use of our time to work on test cases, identify common
>> syntax patterns, and help UAs to get their code fixed.
> +1.  Also, +1 to comments by Mike, Simon, Shelley, Dimitre, Alain and
> Gerrit about browser-driven standardization:
> http://saxonica.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2010/11/4/4671786.html

Posting links to divisive flamebait doesn't seem like a good way to move the conversation forward.

Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 08:18:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:55 UTC