W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Does no-store in request imply no-cache?

From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:14:33 -0600
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Cc: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
Message-Id: <20101017201433.f69cbfb5.eric@bisonsystems.net>
David Morris wrote:
> The pure definition is no use of storage. I see no reason to
> contaminate that definition.

I don't know where you're getting that.  The semantics are don't write
to storage, not don't read from storage -- that's what max-age=0 does,
which may be combined with no-store, if that's the sender intent (of
the request).  I don't think it's required to make no-store have the
same semantics as 'no-store, max-age=0'.  If that couldn't be otherwise
expressed, then I'd likely agree with your position.

Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 02:15:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:55 UTC