W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http-02.txt

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:33:14 +0200
Message-ID: <4C73E63A.7020009@gmx.de>
To: "Eric J. Bowman" <eric@bisonsystems.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 24.08.2010 17:28, Eric J. Bowman wrote:
>>
>> this is a new revision of draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http defining the
>> Content-Disposition header field as used in HTTP, replacing the
>> definition in RFC 2616, and building on the encoding defined in the
>> recently published RFC 5987.
>>
>
> Hey, Julian.  Shouldn't the last word in the following paragraph be
> "filename*"?
>
> "
> "filename" and "filename*" behave the same, except that "filename*"
> uses the encoding defined in [RFC5987], allowing the use of non-ASCII
> characters ([USASCII]).  When both "filename" and "filename*" are
> present, a recipient SHOULD pick "filename*" and ignore "filename" -
> this will make it possible to send the same header value to clients
> that do not support "filename".
> "

Indeed :-)

Thanks, and looking forward to more comments,

Julian
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2010 15:33:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:24 GMT