W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: #147: header-specific canonicalisation

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 00:17:14 -0800
Cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E118CD47-9F5D-4B7D-ABDE-FAA9248F9B4B@gbiv.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
On Mar 3, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Note:
> 
>   If a header field is absent from a request, it can only match another
>   request if it is also absent there.
> 
> Is that still true? I don't think; maybe we can remove the sentence completely?

Yes, it is still true.

   Accept:

means accept nothing (give me a 300 instead).  No Accept header means
accept everything.

....Roy
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 08:17:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:16 GMT