- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:53:20 -0800
- To: Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/05/2010 10:59 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> Don't many headers accept more bytes there? E.g. cookie related headers. >> >> Indeed, Cookies (as specced in RFC 2109) use that pattern as well. > > RFC 2109 isn't used though. Set-Cookie and Cookie are complete > disasters, syntax-wise, and are almost certainly treated as > special-cases even by clients that otherwise use a generic parser. Yeah, I wouldn't use the Set-Cookie header as a syntactic model for anything. :) Adam
Received on Friday, 5 February 2010 21:54:14 UTC