W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155

From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:24:19 +0000
Message-ID: <7789133a1001261224n6397b60djf4471d0202d12c5b@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote:
> OK..This does raise the question of what does a server do.
> I don't know of any servers (in my relatively limited knowledge of servers)
> that doesn't just use the file extension to choose content type when
> serving.
> If the served type is supposed to be the authoritative reference, you get
> problems when a server has a smaller database of extension-to-type than the
> client.
> Otherwise you'd need to re-engineer servers so that content providers can
> manually specify content type when providing content.  That then means
> authors need to know about registered types etc.
> So I can't see this changing any time soon, no matter what we write into
> specs.

Servers are free to select the Content-Type header they send in any
way they choose.  The requirements w.r.t. not using the file extension
over HTTP are for user agents.

Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2010 20:25:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:52 UTC