W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates

From: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 12:29:25 +0200
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <1274696965.22367.31.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
sön 2010-05-23 klockan 12:34 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham:

> I doubt that any valid HTTP messages were generated before 1950, and I *hope* that any remaining implementations that generate two-digit dates will be gone by 2050...

Is any such implementations seen today to a significant amount?

Note: The Squid implementation uses 1970-2070 for two digit years, and I
would expect quite many others doing the same considering limits of Unix
timestamps (0 == 1 Jan 1970).

Received on Monday, 24 May 2010 10:30:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:53 UTC