W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: How many coding registries should we have? (Issue 143), was: Issue 189, Re: Content/Transfer-Codings organization/IANA considerations (issue 143, 188, 189)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 18:01:00 +1000
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6246FB2D-4E50-441F-A394-CEFD3A7D7A60@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
If that implies they'll be separate registries (possibly with the same URL, as it is now), works for me.


On 09/04/2010, at 5:52 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 09.04.2010 05:10, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Personally, I like how IANA has it set up now; a little bit of duplication never hurt anyone, and it avoids the "oh, I didn't notice that column" defence.
>> 
>> Really, though, as long as it's clear where each can be used, I don't have a problem.
> 
> So how about just stating: "IANA should ensure that content coding and transfer coding names may only be the same when the encoding is the same"?
> 
> Best regards, Julian


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 08:01:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:18 GMT