W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Input on request for link relation

From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:19:20 -0600
Message-ID: <4AAA7888.60009@stpeter.im>
To: Kris Zyp <kris@sitepen.com>
CC: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>, Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com>, jpanzer@acm.org, Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>, Atom-Syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/11/09 7:04 AM, Kris Zyp wrote:

> We (Dojo toolkit) have been using REST Channels [1] for clients to
> receive real-time notifications of resource updates. Could/should we
> use the "hub" relation for resources to reference the URI that
> Dojo/clients connect to for updates? And if so it seems like "updates"
> or "notifications" would be a more generic, fitting term than "hub"
> (but "hub" isn't bad).

I like "updates" or "notifications" -- "hub" seems specific to
pubsubhubbub, whereas the pointer might be to a SIP notifications
service, an XMPP PubSub service, or who knows what.

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqqeIgACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyPYQCgn7vT0g0gHgn+/BgNBl0iG3M0
3D8AmwbIOuyYDgUGO7JyfgLm3FD4zbfh
=ECAn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 11 September 2009 16:20:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:10 GMT