W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:46:31 +0200
Message-ID: <4A9B8DE7.5030708@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Noah Slater wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:29:40AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> What I wanted to say is that the text in the registry *can* be read to
>> support only relations to *direct* parents.
> 
> I feel a bit stupid, but I'm not sure what "direct" means here. Or at least, my
> only interpretation of it seems contradictory to the idea that one could
> interpret the registration to require it.
> 
> Could you provide a few examples?

"direct parent" as in "parent", as opposed to "grandparent" or further 
ancestors.

BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 08:47:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:09 GMT