W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard

From: Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:40:14 +0100
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20090831084014.GA20916@tumbolia.org>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:29:40AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> What I wanted to say is that the text in the registry *can* be read to
> support only relations to *direct* parents.

I feel a bit stupid, but I'm not sure what "direct" means here. Or at least, my
only interpretation of it seems contradictory to the idea that one could
interpret the registration to require it.

Could you provide a few examples?

Thanks,

-- 
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 08:40:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:09 GMT