W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Issue 187 (Warn header (P6) vs RFC2047 encoding)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:52:36 +1200
Cc: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7FD08EE6-9D4D-41EF-8467-0494AE9D09D6@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Absent any pushback on this, closing #187.


On 07/08/2009, at 5:55 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> +1. Talking about languages when the charset is constrained -- as  
>>> well as when it's not intended for end-user interpretation --  
>>> makes no sense.
>>>
>>> I'd be more reticent to take this path, BTW, if there were any  
>>> implementation of Warning in UAs. However, since as far as we know  
>>> there isn't, it seems reasonable.
>>> ...
>> Ack.
>> I have removed more text, proposed patch: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/187/187.2.diff 
>> >. ...
>
> I have applied the proposed patch with <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/669 
> >.
>
> BR, Julian


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 01:53:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:08 GMT