W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Issue 187 (Warn header (P6) vs RFC2047 encoding)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 07:55:29 +0200
Message-ID: <4A7BC1D1.9050600@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote:
> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> +1. Talking about languages when the charset is constrained -- as well 
>> as when it's not intended for end-user interpretation -- makes no sense.
>>
>> I'd be more reticent to take this path, BTW, if there were any 
>> implementation of Warning in UAs. However, since as far as we know 
>> there isn't, it seems reasonable.
>> ...
> 
> Ack.
> 
> I have removed more text, proposed patch: 
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/187/187.2.diff>. 
> ...

I have applied the proposed patch with 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/669>.

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 7 August 2009 05:56:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:08 GMT