W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:11:53 +0200
Message-ID: <4A622C89.8090407@gmx.de>
To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>
CC: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Phillips, Addison wrote:
>> Is there some reason why you aren't referring to BCP 47?
> 
> I think they are trying to be specific about their reference to avoid having <Language-Tag> change underneath them. 
> ...

Exactly.

We need a precise reference to an ABNF production and definition here. 
Citing the BCP instead of the concrete document would make it impossible 
to refer to a specific section (or even the name of a production).

BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 18 July 2009 20:12:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:07 GMT