W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Issue 181 (Accept-Language: which RFC4647 filtering?")

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:59:35 +0200
Message-ID: <4A6318B7.4040605@gmx.de>
To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
CC: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
John Cowan wrote:
> Julian Reschke scripsit:
> 
>> The intention was to normatively refer to that matching algorithm that 
>> actually is equivalent to what RFC2616 used to define (remember, we're 
>> not changing the protocol here). Did we pick the wrong one?
> 
> No, basic filtering is the RFC 2616 algorithm all right.  You might
> consider allowing HTTP servers to do lookup if basic filtering
> produces no results: Apache already does this.
> ...

Now tracked as <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/181>.

BR, Julian
Received on Sunday, 19 July 2009 13:00:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:07 GMT