W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 22:09:24 +1100
Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <13A3DF3E-B2B9-4C50-B156-9A48FC334780@mnot.net>
To: Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>


On 03/12/2008, at 9:57 PM, Phil Archer wrote:

> Makes sense to me, yes. The problem is that HTTP is generally seen  
> as authoritative (the thrust of http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect) 
>  so this spec will need to be clear that applications should treat  
> an inbound (rev) link is an exception to this. That might be too  
> close to going against a TAG finding for some??

Nah, that's just in the context of Content-Type (which stretches to  
include encoding).


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2008 11:10:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:58 GMT