Re: proposed change for Issue 103 (content-*)

Julian Reschke wrote:
> OLD:
> 
>   NOT ignore any Content-* (e.g.  Content-Range) headers that it does
>   not understand or implement and MUST return a 501 (Not Implemented)
>   response in such cases.
> 
> NEW:
> 
>   NOT ignore any Content-* headers (e.g. headers starting with the
>   prefix 'Content-') that it does not understand or implement and MUST
>   return a 501 (Not Implemented) response in such cases.

s/e.g./i.e./. (Or just get rid of it.) Otherwise it suggests that there
are "Content-* headers" that don't start with "Content-".

-- Dan