W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: proposed change for Issue 103 (content-*)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:00:19 +0100
Message-ID: <49106383.4090203@gmx.de>
To: Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Dan Winship wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> OLD:
>>
>>   NOT ignore any Content-* (e.g.  Content-Range) headers that it does
>>   not understand or implement and MUST return a 501 (Not Implemented)
>>   response in such cases.
>>
>> NEW:
>>
>>   NOT ignore any Content-* headers (e.g. headers starting with the
>>   prefix 'Content-') that it does not understand or implement and MUST
>>   return a 501 (Not Implemented) response in such cases.
> 
> s/e.g./i.e./. (Or just get rid of it.) Otherwise it suggests that there
> are "Content-* headers" that don't start with "Content-".

Good catch. So

OLD:

    NOT ignore any Content-* (e.g.  Content-Range) headers that it does
    not understand or implement and MUST return a 501 (Not Implemented)
    response in such cases.

NEW:

    NOT ignore any Content-* headers (headers starting with the prefix
    'Content-') that it does not understand or implement and MUST return
    a 501 (Not Implemented) response in such cases.

BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2008 15:07:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:57 GMT