This brings us back to http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/133 ... Amichai Brian Smith wrote: > Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > >> A linear sequence of in-order ranges MAY be merged in the >> response. If there is only a single range left after such >> merges then it SHOULD be sent as a Content-Range response >> instead of multipart/byteranges, but MAY be sent as >> multipart/byteranges is the sender prefer..The recipient MUST >> accept both as valid responses, in addition to the 1-1 mapped >> multipart/byteranges response or any other response that do >> cover the requested ranges including (but not limited to) a >> full non-ranged response. >> > > This is how I read it too, except for the "but MAY be sent as > multipart/byteranges." multipart/byteranges requires two parts. > > - Brian > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1718 - Release Date: 10/10/2008 07:07 > >Received on Sunday, 12 October 2008 07:46:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:56 GMT