- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:13:35 -0400
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > Shane McCarron wrote: >> >> Mark, >> >> I think that you should defer to the spec at >> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab for the definitive list of rel and rev >> values. That document is written in XHTML+RDFa and is maintained as part of >> the W3C process for defining XHTML. >> ... > > a) What's the registration process? > > b) Why would it be a good idea to have relations between resources being > defined specifically for one vocabulary? Shouldn't relation names be > re-usable between HTML, XHTML, Atom, and other formats (*)? +1 Mark.
Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 14:14:16 UTC