Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > ... > I am fine with deprecating 305 as "never implemented", moving it's > definition to an appendix explaining the differences between 2616 and > 2616bis. > ... :-) That's what I was trying to do. Do you want to propose concrete text? BR, JulianReceived on Tuesday, 25 March 2008 13:38:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 June 2008 08:04:35 GMT