W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: 307 Temporary Redirect

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:45:45 +0100
Message-ID: <47DD3299.1020400@gmx.de>
To: Nicolas Alvarez <nicolas.alvarez@gmail.com>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org

Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Should the description for 307 status code *explicitly* say that the 
> method must be the same? It says the client should use the new URI, and 
> without anything talking about methods, implicitly I can guess the 
> method shouldn't be changed. But it's not explicitly stated. There could 
> be problems with an implementor misreading it.
> Maybe the same should be done with all redirection codes.

Not convinced.

Do you have any evidence of implementors who actually did get this wrong?

BR, Julian
Received on Sunday, 16 March 2008 14:46:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:45 UTC