Re: Proposal: i105 Classification for Allow header

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:55:46AM -0700, Brian Smith wrote:
> 
> Robert Siemer wrote:
> > I haven't seen a response to my comment: why is it important 
> > or valid under the current charter to remove the possibility 
> > to use "Allow" in a request?
> 
> The change does not forbid the use of "Allow" in a request. It just
> makes its semantics undefined for requests. That makes sense, because in
> practice people are not following the RFC 2616 semantics for that case.

Okay, that sounds reasonable to me.


Robert