Re: i22: ETags on PUT responses

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Werner Baumann wrote:
>>
>> Other examples? Clients that just know about RFC 4918 and that use 
>> simple WebDAV-servers like Apache/mod_dav/mod_dav_fs or IIS for 
>> distributed authoring. They will never be able to make use of etags in 
>> PUT-responses, when it is defined according to your proposal.
> 
> You are still focused on HTTP-as-a-filesystem-replacement. That's really 
> only one use case.
> 
Didn't know that distributed authoring is the same as 
"HTTP-as-a-filesystem-replacement". Besides, my opinion on that matter 
is well documented in the davfs2-README-file. You might have looked at 
e.g. 
http://dav.cvs.sourceforge.net/dav/davfs2/README?revision=1.27&view=markup 
before inventing my opinion by your own.
As I understand, making up of offending nonsense like "You are still 
focused on HTTP-as-a-filesystem-replacement." is meant to terminate 
communication. Agreed.

Werner