Werner Baumann wrote: > Julian Reschke wrote: >> >> In particular: >> >> - E does not apply to Rq >> >> - the presence of E in Rs does not necessarily imply that the body >> sent with PUT was stored octet-by-octet >> >> - E does not depend on the request method, just on URI & selecting >> headers >> > I wonder what the intended use of this Etag, sent in response to a > PUT-request, would be. As the entity, sent in a subsequent GET is not > guaranteed to be equal to the body of the PUT-request, not a single > client knows the entity. But clients get an entity-tag - for an unknown > entity. What are they supposed to use it for? They can still use it in all kinds of conditional operations. See <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-http-etag-on-write-08.html> for examples, and keep in mind that just because a resource supports PUT doesn't necessarily mean the server is a replacement for a file server -- the storage may be XML based, for instance. BR, JulianReceived on Friday, 4 January 2008 22:17:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 October 2011 12:14:00 GMT