W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: relation registry

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:25:01 +0200
Message-ID: <485B938D.2040408@gmx.de>
To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org

Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>  
>> Hm, looking at 
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-01>,
>> I don't see "ifragment" mentioned anywhere...
> 
> It's in section 3.1:
> 
> | Relationship values are URIs that identify the type of link.  If
> | the relationship is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be considered
> | to be <http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations.html#>, and
> | the value MUST be present in the link relation registry.
> 
> Roughly anything after the first # in an IRI is a <ifragment>.  I
> had RFC 4287 atom:link in mind, that talks about IRIs.  Mark's I-D
> is for HTTP => URIs, I should have written <fragment>, sorry.
 > ...

Aha.

I consider this a bug in Mark's draft. The base URI should IMHO stay the 
same as in RFC4287.

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 11:25:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:48 GMT