i59, was: Status of IANA Considerations (registrations and registries) -- issues 40, 59, 72, 79

Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> B. Status Codes: <http://www.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/40>
>>
>> I have added instructions to update the status code registry in P2.
>>
>> Question:
>>
>> 3) The current status code registration procedure is hiding in a 
>> really obscure place 
>> (<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2817#section-7.1>), should Part 2 take 
>> over (me thinks yes). Should we keep the registration requirements 
>> (IETF standards track)?
> 
> Yes and yes.
>  ...

Proposed patch: 
<http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/59/i59.diff>.

This copies RFC2817's reg. procedure into P2, Section 5 ("Status Code 
and Reason Phrase"), and updates the IANA Considerations and the Change 
Log accordingly.

BR, Julian