W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: 100-continue implementation status question

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:24:00 +1000
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <38EA2A76-2114-48AD-B9F2-B51028A2F149@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

I've fired off a message.


On 01/06/2008, at 10:50 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

>
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Paul Leach wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Can people help with the following question:
>>>
>>> How widely implemented is 100-continue? And how correctly?
>>> ...
>> In Java servlet world: the servers do implement it partly.
>> That is, they understand Expect: 100-continue, and reply with 100  
>> Continue when asked for it.
>> However, the containers do not let the servlets have a say  
>> (inspecting the request, and potentially saying "417 Expectation  
>> Failed"). This is a restriction that has been known for a long  
>> time, and I certainly hope the Java Servlet EG will address that at  
>> some point of time (I haven't checked recently, so maybe they  
>> already did and I missed it).
>
> Speaking of which... does anybody know whether the Servlet EG is  
> following this mailing list?
>
> BR, Julian
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 2 June 2008 03:24:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:48 GMT