Hmm. That's the opposite of the direction I *thought* we were going in. If a parameter specifies a token, e.g., charset, I read the discussion as saying that we should also accept a quoted-string. This allows the approach that Frank was talking about (quote everything, just for safety and simplicity's sake). If a parameter specifies a quoted-string, there isn't any corresponding rationale to support also allowing a token. That's why I wrote the proposal as I did. On 11/04/2008, at 10:33 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > > tor 2008-04-10 klockan 17:17 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke: > >> I have my doubts. Why add special cases in producers when it's not >> needed? Or *are* special cases needed? > > I wouldn't expect all parsers to deal with quoted parameters in all > cases.. the current specs is a bit fuzzy on that. > > But I do expect the ones who deal with quoted parameters to also > handle > the token form.. > > Regards > Henrik > > > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 01:24:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 October 2011 12:14:01 GMT