W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: i51, was: Moving to editorial: i39 / i51 / i61 / i64 / i94

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:41:38 +1000
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <DED6B74C-F925-498E-8D1B-8D6A3957C43F@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>


On 04/04/2008, at 1:25 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> HN> Maybe we shoud split the HTTP-date BNF for the older dates in  
> two steps
> HN> to stress this within the BNF as well? I.e. something like the
> HN> following:
> HN>
> HN> 	HTTP-date     = rfc1123-date | obsolete-date
> HN> 	obsolete-date = rfc850-date | asctime-date


+1


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 00:42:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:47 GMT